As a criminologist advisor for the state of Nevada, I am going to review the upcoming bill that depart be voted on by the legislator and make some recommendations approximately the change of doubling the maximum prison bound for anyone convicted of arm looting. This bill is very popular in many former(a) states but in the state of Nevada, some individuals are unsettled whether or not doubling the maximum prison term will do any good. When an individual commits a villainy and are convicted of that shame, some will return to committing that same crime once released, others will be rehabilitated and continue normal lives. So what would be the appropriate punishment to deter criminals from committing crime in the first place?
The state of Nevada defines looting as the unlawful taking of someoneal property from the someone of another, or in his presence, against his will, by means of force or violence or fear of injury, immediate or future, to his psyche or property, or the person or property, or the person or property of a member of his family, or anyone in his company at the time of the robbery (Nevada State Legislation, n.d., NRS 200.380) by the use of a weapon.
In the state of Nevada, the period minimum sentence for a Category B felony is a minimum of one year and a maximum of 20 years. Robbery is considered a Category B felony in Nevada. Nevada does not recognize armed robbery that would be considered aggravate robbery which is still listed under Category B. With this new bill alter robbery would then be a minimum of deuce years and a maximum of 40 years. Will this suffice or hurt society? Armed or aggravated robbery should be held at a higher model because of the threat of...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment