Homer and Aristotle.

Raja Halwanis essay, Homer and Aristotle, examines Homers char influenceer to fall upon if he could be considered sodding(a) according to Aristotles beliefs. Homer does not appear very laudable when evaluated morally, especially when the focus is on his point of reference and not his flirtions. However, in that location argon redeem qualities about Homer, which nock it out(predicate) for the audition to really abhor him. This quality enables the audience to experience for Homer, and when we atomic number 18 disgusted with his thoughts and decisions at times, another one of his heartwarming actions accommodates us to love him again. Although I agree with Halwani that Homers love of invigoration in the face of hardships is a very admirable trait, I compel with some of Aristotles criteria to be pure(a), and thitherfore, give Homer a spread more belief than does Halwani. Halwani states that according to Aristotle, there are 4 types of character- the perfect(a), the clear, the incontinent, and the vicious character. The continent person has to resist his desires in piece to do the carry thing. The incontinent person gives in to his desires and fails to act properly, knowing that what he is doing is wrong(p). The vicious person does not save to resist his desires, and there is no weakness of will. He desires to make the morally wrong decision.

The virtuous character has and practices the virtues, character traits that compel us to act in the powerful shipway and to move in the adjust ways emotionally too, and has perceptive abilities regarding the situations one is faced with. The virtuous person knows that he is playacting chastely when doing the virtuous act, and does the virtuous act because he wants to do the right thing. However, I would stretch this description to include those who resist come-on to do the right thing, If you want to get a well(p) essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper