'“Hero of Our Time” by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and “One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich” by Mikhail Lermontov Essay\r'

'The ii unfermenteds â€Å"Hero of Our clip” scripted by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and â€Å" 1 solar day in the manners of Ivan Denisovich” written by Mikhail Lermontov will be comp ard for this World Literature Assignment (Comparative Study). The main(prenominal) contri thoions of these two inventions will be compared and distinguished. In â€Å"Hero of Our Time” the main graphic symbol is Grigory Alexandrovich Pechorin and the main character in â€Å" superstar Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich” is Ivan Denisovich (Shukhov).\r\nThe novel â€Å"Hero of Our Time” is composed of quint short stories and is astir(predicate) the adventures of the main character Pechorin. There are three main narrators in this novel, who are, the travel writer, Pechorin and Maxim Maximych. Lermontov has utilise three narrators so the indorsers puke catch up with three different posts making the contributor see different views of the characters in the boo k. The ref too learns that the five short stories are non in chronological order. This makes it whatso perpetually what confusing for the lector but at the same while gets the reader unfeignedly interested in the book. The story is about how Pechorin is struggling in the society he is brisk in and besides at the same time struggling with himself. We mystify out his true feelings and thoughts in his diary where the reader feels sympathy for him. Pechorin to other characters in the book is never hvirtuosost and sometimes is not in control of his emotions and actions. The organise of the author is to gift the readers if Pechorin really is the pigboat of his time or not. This is very teetotal since the lack of morality suggests that he is not a traditional hero.\r\nThe novel â€Å" peerless Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich” is a description of atomic number 53 of Shukhov’s long time in a toil receive where he has been sendenced for ten years. We lear n how prison house life is harsh and tough. In the promote camp it is all about surviving, comradeliness (between the Prisoners) and corruption. The reader learns that the notwithstanding free time Prisoners cod is during their meals. The prison life has coerce some people to change. An archetype of this is where one of the tiptives, Fetiukov, has become the type of man who would slip ones mind potatoes out of another man’s soup. The style of the novel is understated and straightforwarfared. Solzhenitsyn has written this book very descriptively. Everything has been described accurately so the reader throw out hypothecate and visualize the surroundings. An font of this is when Shukhov is describing the mess mansion:\r\nâ€Å"The mess-hall seemed as usual, with clouds of vapour curling in with the door and men seated shoulder to shoulder standardised seeds in a sunflower”1\r\nThis novel is written in the 3rd mortal form but we see through Shukhovâ€℠¢s eyes. We get to know him as a first mortal so we get a broad perspective of him and as well others, how they way at Shukhov. We show compliancy to Shukhov since he is surviving the chilliness harsh conditions.\r\nâ€Å"The cold stung. A swarthy fog wrapped itself round Shukhov and make him cough painfully”\r\nIn the labour camp the authority treats the prisoners like animals where Shukhov treats them as comrades. Shukhov’s one day in the labour camp is representing the lives of millions of people who were sent to get camps during Stalin’s regime.\r\nIf we look at Pechorin’s characteristics we learn that he has the characteristics of a Byronic Hero. This can be said by looking at his behaviour, he is sulky, creates the feel of mystery, is isolated from the society and also rebels against neighborly niceties of the time. â€Å"A Hero of Our Time” involves women. Pechorin is panicked to get in love or make each kind of committedness with any women since a fortune bank clerk once told his mother that he would pass when he gets married. Pechorin thinks about this and tries to avoid it, then he makes excuses for not making any commitments with women. The reader gets the feeling that he is irrational, although it’s clean-cut that he has an ambivalent character. Pechorin is a psyche who contradicts himself. He sets out to do something and at the end does the total diametric of it. This shows that he can be misleading.\r\nâ€Å"I lied, but I wanted to fool him. I was born with a rut for contradiction. My whole life has been nothing but a series of dismal, unsuccessful attempts to go against heart or reason”\r\nPechorin can be described as a womanizer since he likes to play against women’s emotions and use them so they can bring in him and fulfill his somebodyal desires. He gets this pleasure when he uses women, making him feel like a ‘hero’. The reader also learns that he is a ch aracter who can’t level be fair to himself. This is not perpetually the case, for example when he writes in his journal he always tries to be honest. Pechorin is very self-analytical because he analyzes motives so we can see things from his perspective.\r\nâ€Å"I’ve always hated entertaining, but now each day my house is full of guests, dining, supping, gambling.”\r\nPechorin makes the reader also assumes that his mental break overpower will be from women.\r\nNow if we look at the characteristics of Shukhov, we learn that Shukhov is a prisoner of war in a fag camp. Life is very hard, just one day of his life shows so such(prenominal) about the living standards he is living in. Shukhov is a disciplined person and has not lost his train behaviour, like for example he would always take his cap off while eating notwithstanding when it’s freezing. Similarly Pechorin also has experience but his pride is his self- adore and his arrogance, loosely sup erficial things. The low living standards restrain made Shukhov enjoy little things for example building a wall, smuggling a piece of hacksaw blade so he can make a knife out of it. The most historic characteristic about him is that he is a very honest man oddly to his comrades. He gives them respect and realizes like him he should not be here. The strong wedge between his friends makes him want to live on. comradeship is essential because without comradeship in the drudge camp, surviving would be really difficult. Shukhov’s pride and dignity has been taken away(p) from him and he only thinks of surviving this labor camp. In the labor camp his ruin days are when he gets surplus food and has not ended up in the lock-up. He sometimes thinks irrefutable and thinks about the future that there is assuage some hope. He hopes to meet his family which is delay for him.\r\nIf we compare the two characters we see that Shukhov has a much stronger bond with his comrades/friend s than Pechorin has with his friends. Shukhov has to have friends in order to persist in the prison because if he doesn’t he would be even more mentally busted down. The bond of friendship makes him live on in that dreadful prison. It can also be said that Shukhov is a person who we can respect and who also shows respect to others.\r\nThere is also a parity between the two characters which is that they were/are both(prenominal) soldiers. This means that they have both encountered war and seen the dreadful sides of it. Another important affinity between them is that they are both molded by society and the time that they live in. Although Shukhov is in prison and Pechorin isn’t the reader feels that Shukhov still has more license. This is because Shukhov is a person who won’t hurt anyone and respect everyone. In return he is also trusted and no one has ever hurt him before. The reader feels that Shukhov has inner cessation and that he is a kind of exemption . On the other hand Pechorin does not have that inner peace which Shukhov has this is because he is a selfish person thinking only of his desires. Since Shukhov is in prison he has the freedom of his political ideas and these cannot be punished since he is already in prison. This again shows how Shukhov has the freedom to do this but Pechorin doesn’t.\r\nIt can be concluded that Shukhov has a stronger character than Pechorin. This is because Shukhov is in general a pleasant person who respects everyone. He is a civilized man and always thinks how he could survive the rest of the years so he can go back to his family. Pechorin is quite opposite to Shukhov, he has a light(a) character. This is because he is not trustworthy even at times not to himself because he contradicts him self a lot. It can be felt that Shukhov is the greater hero of his time since he makes the reader sympathise for him without creating sympathy. moreover Pechorin wants the readers to sympathise for hi m by explaining his feelings, emotions and actions all the time.\r\nBibliography\r\nBooks:\r\n1) Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (2000): One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, Penguin Classics; England\r\n2) Mikhail Lermontov (2001): A Hero of Our Time, Penguin Classics; England\r\n1 â€Å"One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich”, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Penguin Classics Edition (2000), England, foliate 118\r\n2 â€Å"One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich”, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Penguin Classics Edition (2000), England, page 23\r\n3 â€Å"A Hero of Our Time”, Mikhail Lermontov, Penguin Classics (2001), England, page 77\r\n4 â€Å"A Hero of Our Time”, Mikhail Lermontov, Penguin Classics (2001), England, page 84\r\n'