Cosmopolis: a World of Subjective Reality Essay

Cosmopolis, written in the spirit of post modernity, rejects the conceit of an ordered universe with whiz verifiable earthly concern. This wise asserts that h angiotensin converting enzymesty is instead subjective, and as hu public macrocosms while we all experience the same ane population , advertize we severally perceive this experience differently, and in that respectfore we all buy the farm in different k instantlyledge domains. In this subject using adverts from Cosmopolis, I pass on explain how founding father DeLillo uses converse and the actions of characters to construct his consideration for subjective unfeignedity, and how his hypothesis of subjective reality relates to the real creative activity.Before I begin quoting Cosmopolis, I will briefly explain the modern definition of subjective reality. The stem of subjective reality asserts that reality and of the truths in the universe changes between individuals. Meaning, although there may be objecti ve truths in the universe, each person perceives these truths and experiences them differently, and because of ein truth hotshots own unique perspective of the realism, each lives in their own world existing in an altered state of objective reality. Cosmopolis is littered with converse where the characters argon lecture around subjective reality.You could almost randomly snap to any page in the novel and find that roughly 1 is talk about subjective reality. It was obvious to me that Don DeLillo purposefully wrote this dialogue adding an argument for the existence of subjective reality. Although one could argue I read the novel bearinging for mountain talking about subjective reality and that in reality it is all in my head, for the purposes of this paper I am sacking to assume Don DeLillo purposely wrote Cosmopolis as an argument for subjective reality. whizz of the first lines of dialogue which I encountered that got me to thinking about subjective reality is near the r attling beginning of the novel when Eric is in the limousine talking with setback. Shiner asks Eric wherefore they were in the car instead of the short letter to which Eric replies, how do you know were in the car instead of the office (15). This quote is a unblemished display case of one of the aspects of subjective reality that a person depose never truly be sure of where they atomic number 18, and that no matter where they actually be, they can choose to be somewhere else.Eric is in a way challenging Shiner to prove both that they are in a car and that they are non in an office. However, these are impossible things to prove, because a person can chose to be wherever they sine qua non to be regardless of actual physical position. Ideal to subjective reality, Shiner doesnt even so off attempt to answer Erics question, because he knows he cant prove either arguments. Plus, the fact that Eric chooses to turn his limo into an office shows that even though Eric knows his c ar is not an office, he makes it into an office only precisely by acting as if it is an office.Like Eric, Beeno Levin is unseasoned(prenominal) character in Cosmopolis who understands the nature of subjective reality. As he is composing he beings to talk about what he pecks in other people and what that means, saying it is what people think they chew the fat in other person that makes his reality. If they think he walks at a slant, thus he walks at a slant, uncoordinated, because this is his role in the lives approximately him (57). Beeno is making 2 assertions on the nature of people in reality. Firstly, Beeno is asserting that no matter what a person actually does, it is what you think they do that is reality.Meaning, in his example, whether a man walks with a slant or not, if you think he walks with a slant, then he walks with a slant. Secondly, when he says, about the man, that this is his role in the lives around him, he means that to him the man who walks with a sl ant is nothing except the man who walks with the slant. In Beenos life the role of the man is to do nothing except walk around with a slant. Whether the man does anything other than walking with a slant, such as being an accountant or having children, to Beeno he can never be any of those things, because he is merely the man who walks with a slant.The man can never be anything else unless Beeno chooses to see him that way. Near the reverse of Beenos monologue he alike thinks that world is supposed to mean something thats gathered. barely nothing is self-contained. Everything enters something else. My small days spill into light years (60). Here he is making another assertion on the nature of reality and how it relates to the world. When he says the world is self-contained he is challenging the report that the truths in the world can be separated and neatly pushed into categories.He asserts that in reality the elements of the world cannot be separated and everything is meltin g into everything else. There are actually no boundaries because one can perceive the world and anything could be anything else, for example, a limo can be an office. Here in this next quote the characters actually slit to directly discuss reality. At this point in the story Eric and one of his advisors, Kinski, are chatting in the limo during the protest. Kinski baits Eric, asking him what the flaw of human beings rationality is.When he asks what, she answers replying that it pret closings not to see the horror and death at the end of the schemes it builds (91). Ironically, she is asserting that human rationality isnt even concerned with being accurate to reality. Human rationality strives to create its own deluded reality outside(a) of what might actually be happening, such as in this example the evils of capitalism. It is deluded, ignoring the facts and believing whatever it wants to believe, such as the disparity between the bountiful and poor in the United States.Although Kinski, in this context, is only commenting on gentleman as a whole, this idea can be applied to human rationality on an individual basis. An individual may delude themselves in the same way, for example Eric continues to lose money on the Yen even though all evidence is telling him he should cut his losses and pull out. He is deluded in ignoring the facts, rejecting what he sees, and formulating his own new reality where he doesnt pull out and makes a lot of money off the Yen. Some of my favorite moments in Cosmopolis are during the last barb when Beeno shoots Eric.The two of them seem to understand each other, and even hold some of the same beliefs, such as the subjective nature of reality. At one point, Beeno is convinced that his penis is shrinking and receding into his body, while Eric tries to convince him that is not true. Beeno says, whether I imagine a thing or not, its real to me (192). Eric asks been to prove it is true by showing him, and Beeno refuses saying, I dont attain to look. There are folk beliefs. There are epidemics that happen. hands in the thousands, in real fear and pain (192). Beeno is asserting something new this time.He has al warm asserted that a person can look at something, such as the man with the slant, and see anything they want to see (a man walking with a slant), whether that is actually what they are looking at. But now, he is asserting a man can look at nothing and see something that isnt even visibly there. This is even further into subjective reality, it is one thing to say something can be something that is not, but it is entirely different to say that nothing can be something. Beeno even tries to support his belief that his sex organ is receding into his body with two different arguments.The first is that other men have experienced it, and hence it is a real thing. The second one is that thousands of other men also fear it, and that it is a real fear. This argument is based on the idea that the very fear itself of something happening is just as real as if it were actually happening. This is another element of subjective reality. Beeno fears that something is happening to his body, even though he knows he cant see it, but this very fear itself makes it real to him whether or not it is actually happening.During the climax of the novel, Eric begins to underrate Beeno by telling him that he doesnt even have a good, admirable reason to kill him, that Beeno is just another whack play cleaning someone just because none Your crime had no conscience. You harbourt been driven to do it by some oppressive friendly force. How I hate to be reasonable. Youre not against the rich. Nobodys against the rich. Everybodys ten seconds from being rich. Or so everybody thought . No. Your crime is in your head (196). Here Eric is severe to tear bring Beenos righteous justification for killing Eric.Eric is saying that Beeno isnt killing Eric for the greater good of society, getting rid of a bad powered ric h person, Beeno is just killing Eric just because. Eric asserts Beenos own motives are all in his head, that Beeno is deluded and doesnt actually know why he is killing Eric, he is just doing it. This is a very odd turn. At the beginning of this novel Eric has been a perfect spokesperson for subjective reality, but here he seems to be playing devils instigate by trying to tear down Beenos arguments.I wondered why Eric would make such a sudden change, but after culture the book I believe it is clear Eric isnt actually trying to tear down subjective reality, he is just saying whatever he can to buy time and possibly not die. whizz of my good friends from primary school used to say that when he died the world would end. His names is Martin, and he is a genius. I am not a genius, but I enjoyed a lot of philosophical conversations with Martin nevertheless. I was sincerely surprised when I came across exactly the same thing in this novel.It is right at the beginning when Eric first ge ts up and is getting ready to leave. He is lamenting his insomnia and thinks when he died he would not end, the world would end (6). I believe this quote embodies the spirit of subjective reality. If reality exists on an individual basis, and is only inside the mind of every person, then logically it would follow that when that person dies their reality, their world would end too. Possibly the most perfect aspect of this novel is the way Don DeLillo parallels this quote with the structure of the story.When Eric is about to be shot, it is obvious that he is going to die, however the novel ends with just his thoughts right before Beeno kills him. Nothing follows, that is the end of the story. How perfect that the novel ends with the very last thought of Eric It makes absolute sense that the novel would end when Eric dies, because as already stated he wouldnt end when he died, the world would end. Postmodernism encourages experiment in literature, and Don DeLillo takes full advantage o f this.As an American I was always taught there were rules and truths that ruled the Universe. That reality was always objective and one merely has to interpret it correctly. Objective reality is the idea significant to the success of religious and political systems. Every religion claims to be the one true religion, and without the claim of objective reality these religions would fail. This is also very a lot true in political, ethnocentricity being a perfect example of the do of people believing there is an objective reality to the universe.In conclusion, Don DeLillo argues for the existence of subjective reality in his novel Cosmopolis. He utilizes the dialogue and the actions of the main characters to debate this idea and highlight crucial elements of the theory. In this paper I have analyzed several quotations from different scenes in the novel, explaining how each quotation represents an aspect of subjective reality. Subjective reality may have sounded like a crazy idea in the past, but now as we live in post modernity, subjective reality is chop-chop gaining acceptance.