Privacy In Turkey :: Research Private Essays

secretiveness In TurkeyIntroductionWhat is backstageness? Who decides what is private and what is non? Is it acceptable if approximatelyone interferes or discloses own(prenominal) breeding? These are some of the questions that we face everyday in our lives. It is mostly up to the individual to turn back some information private but what happens when the flow of information occurs found on the trust to the underlying infrastructure, such as phone lines? Should we, as individuals, expect that every phone conversation is being monitored or as confidential?It is known that knowledge of information is vital, especially in the twenty-first century where the timeliness, accuracy, and confidentiality of information mean everything. In 1988, United Nations Commissioner on humanity Rights Article 17 states that integrity and confidentiality of messages should be guaranteed despite this fact, many countries, principally the US, have involved in an effort to limit individual privacy an d improve the ability of governmental agencies to listen in personal conversations.1 As an example of such activities, this paper will provide information regarding an existing case that took place in capital city of Turkey, Ankara in 1999. The case will be followed by some facts that will be relevant then an analysis from different ethical perspectives on this takings will take place. This paper will conclude by picture my personal ideas and reasoning on the ethical aspects of this particular privacy case.Privacy CaseIn 1999, Ankara police was sued because of listening in personal telephone conversations of Prime Minister.2 It was later discovered that, Prime Minister was not the only person whose phone lines were tapped, an additional 962 peoples private conversations were interfered with also.3 Among the victims there were governors, businessmen, attorneys at law, and journalists. This was a much publicized incident cod to its scope and effect on the privacy and notion of priv acy for individuals. As a result, home(a) Ministry of Turkey was sued for invading privacy of individuals but Interior Ministry declined these allegations and stated that nothing really bad happened at the end.2 None of the information that was gathered during the eavesdropping sessions was disclosed. In addition to suing of Interior Ministry, some of the officers from Ankara law Department were sued and some of them were convicted.3FactsIn Turkey, there are laws that are sympathetic to the US Fourth Amendment. Individuals have expectation of privacy. Article 20 of Turkish Constitute states that the privacy of individual and family life is protected under the law.