Undercurrents of Imperialism and Colonialism in Star Trek :: Movie Film Essays

Undercurrents of Imperialism and Colonialism in head travel principal Trek mirrored the Cold War/Vietnam paranoia of the late sixtiesin command of the Enterprise, the Federation had an uneasy peace with its adversaries, the Klingons and Romulans ( in that respect were many episodes that came down to Kirk vs. the Klingons). In one episode Kirk and his Klingon counterpart each tried to influence an uphill culture to see things their wayremember Vietnam, Chile, and El Salvador? In another, Kirk and Spock were displace to spy on the Romulans so they could steal their cloak (stealth?) technology. And there was Kirk yellowed shirt torn across his chest, with blood on his forehead or across his cheekbone. There would be a weapon in his micklesomething primitive, a knife perhapsand he would circle the battleground (often an bowling ball for those barbaric aliens) staring intensely at his opponent. In the background there would be dramatic music (what comedian Dana Gould refers to as t he Star Trek fist fight theme). Suddenly the combatants would join in their deadly dance until, inevitably, Kirk would stand victorious over his enemy, a powerful example of a superior culture. Indeed, Kirk often displayed cultural transcendency over his romanticist conquests he was irresistible to alien women because he was such a o.k. example of a superior culture. The lusty-busty alienettes would flock to him (much to the distress of their fellow aliens) and Kirk would record them what it meant to be in the Federation. Meanwhile, in the real world, the Cold War raged on. And Star Treks masters used characters like Chekov to ridicule the Soviet Union. Remember his accent? And what about all his claims of Russian cultural superiority? What about the item that he would saystraight facedthat the Russians invented the phone, that Shakespeare was Russian, and that Russia was the fount of all culture, while Kirk (and his audience) knew that all the things Chekov claimed as Russian were part of our controlling West knew that Chekov, and by extension Russia, was one big joke. But the fact that he was there at all (as a minority) reassured an American audience that the United States was superior and that its culture, not Soviet Marxism, was the way things should be. This brings us to Picards Star Trek, as different from Kirks as 1995 is from 1968.